Book Not a Work From Author only, You Love It because the Idea also In Your Brain

One You Love, One You Mind

War, politics, philosophy / past, present, future

North American Empire Trends, Change, Reformers

1. Imperial core in “Empire-breeding Belt”
2. Land Power vs. Sea Power Politics: Which Prevails?
3. Co-rulers of the land-based power order?
4. What Greenland does for a land-based America Empire?
5. How USA lead next Imperial Order?

Core Europe Empire
Confusion, Loss, Suffering

1. Core Eu far from “Empire-breeding Belt”
2. Formally entering 200 yrs “Fading Cycle”
3. Social, Product, Wealth Logic hinder European resurgence.
4. What 2022 war means is whole EU becoming a colony or taxed zone.
5. Ukraine Trench divides Europe 100yrs+

East Asian Empires
Impact, Unity, and Glory

1. Asia: The Force Calling for a New Order.
2. Land power politics says, Regionalization asts. Sea-based power must go fading.
3.  Land-based imperial order leads human history, Sea-based not.
4. Order means taking difference. Order be needed. Empire be needed always.

1. EDD1
2. EDD2
3. EDD3

1. EDD1
2. EDD2
3. EDD3

1. EDD1
2. EDD2
3. EDD3

Crazy Ye (Ye Qiquan)’s Commentary on N. American Empire

N. American Empire continues to evolve until a dominant national identity emerges. Certain politicians play significant roles in this process

The United States is a continuation of the European empire. Essentially, it is an organic part of the European empire. Later, it gradually evolved into the core of the European empire. The core of the American empire will continue to evolve. Localization will be the foundation for the enduring existence of the American empire. 2022 is the historic year in which the American empire formally declared its separation from its European parent body.

See the upcoming “Cycles of Imperial Rise and Fall”

See the upcoming “Cycles of Imperial Rise and Fall”

See the upcoming “Cycles of Imperial Rise and Fall”

See the upcoming “Cycles of Imperial Rise and Fall”

See the upcoming “Cycles of Imperial Rise and Fall”


Crazy Ye’s Commentary on East Asian Empires

See the upcoming “Cycles of Imperial Rise and Fall”

See Ye Qiquan, “The Attributes and Intensity of War”.

See Ye Qiquan, “The Attributes and Intensity of War”.

(To be calculated based on the new “foundation of imperial power”)

The “Geo-Based Calculation System for Imperial Power” will be launched soon.


Crazy Ye’s Commentary on European Empires


See Ye Qiquan, “The Attributes and Intensity of War”.

See Ye Qiquan, “The Attributes and Intensity of War”.

See Ye Qiquan, “The Attributes and Intensity of War”.

See Ye Qiquan, “The Attributes and Intensity of War”.

See Ye Qiquan’s “Whose War? Winners and Losers in the Ukraine War”.

Crazy Ye’s Thinking on Next Generation of Imperial Order

Land Power Empire:

Land-based empires have dominated the main axis of human imperial history. Sea-based empires have only been temporary or temporary substitutes.
(Imperial Development Zone: Illustration by Ye Qiquan, from pppnet.net)

Land Power Empire:

Land-based politics has already established the power base to dominate the world order.
(Comparison of Chinese anti-ship weapon ranges with US ship-launched weapon ranges: Chart by Ye Qiquan, from pppnet.net)

The decline of maritime politics is a historical trend.

Even if the United States could defeat China in a war in East Asia, it would have to rely on land power rather than sea power.

The decline of maritime politics is both a reality and a historical inevitability. (Comparison of the ranges of China’s and the United States’ current medium- and short-range missiles: Illustration by Ye Qiquan, from pppnet.net)

The interaction between the US and China will determine the type of the next imperial order.

The next generation of imperial order will primarily have four variants (a comparison of the intensity of war between the US-led alliance and the Chinese-led alliance in a hypothetical East Asian war. Illustration by Ye Qiquan. From pppnet.net).

“Sea Empire”

Sea-powered empires are both easy to expand and easy to collapse.

“Land Empire”

It was neither easy to expand nor easy to completely destroy the foundations of its empire.

“Philosophical Logic”

The philosophical logic of the Chinese empire was ill-suited to supporting the establishment of a global imperial order.

“Conflict”

Land-based empires struggle to establish a globally dominant order; sea-based empires find it difficult to resist land-based advantages in specific regions.

Effective range

It is composed of three factors: “range”, “damage effect” and “economic efficiency”.

Effective range

“Effective range” defines the “dominant weapon on the battlefield” in different eras of warfare technology.

Crazy Ye’s  War Theory

The nature of war


The universality of war


Universality refers to a state of war:

It is not exclusive to humans, but is shared by all living things in the Earth’s ecosystem.

Universality also indicates that competition for ecological position within the Earth’s ecosystem is a universal and continuous phenomenon.

Even small differences in competitive ability can have huge follow-up effects at the group level and throughout history.

Biological attributes of war

The biological attributes of war:

It refers to the ability to wage war as an individual attribute embedded in the DNA database of all living beings (including humans) for use at any time.

At the group level, a few unique traits of individuals tend to converge with the uniformity of the group. Under the pressure of war, the group’s group attributes are stimulated or enhanced. Altruistic and selfish attributes merge under the stimulation of group attributes.

The economic attributes of war

War is a perennial theme in the process of biological evolution. Economic considerations are the sole guideline and main axis for the course of war.

The economic attributes of war consist of three components.

The causes of war are driven by economic objectives.
The course of war is dominated by economic resources.

The outcome of a war is determined by economic jurisdiction.

Learn more

The political and philosophical attributes of war

Human warfare possesses a unique attribute that other biological warfare lacks: its philosophical and political nature.

In other words, war is not the only means of survival that humanity can rely on. Humans possess the ability to “actively escape and avoid war.” This is the unique characteristic of human warfare.

The logic of wealth, economics, society, and different logics of war. The intertwining of these factors can also be categorized within the philosophical and political attributes of war.

The universality of war

War is a common attribute of all living things in the Earth’s ecosystem. Human wars mainly occur in the course of competition with other biological populations.

From a timeline perspective, humanity’s past evolutionary journey has been extremely arduous. In the future, even more brutal and dangerous wars will occur in the competition between humans and other biological groups or “biological groups.”

Humanity cannot cease maintaining, cultivating, and evolving its own competitive capabilities. Humanity cannot reject war, much less automatically weaken its own competitive (war) capabilities.

Biological attributes of war

The biological attributes of war:

Warfare is a biological capability. It is the ability shared by all living organisms to achieve the continuous evolution and reproduction of their species by strengthening their competitive capabilities.

Warfare capability becomes a kind of DNA memory, recorded in the DNA database of organisms.

Warfare attributes are not only inherited at the individual level, but also continuously developed and evolved at the group level.


The economic attributes of war

Single-celled organisms and plants use intelligent information sensing and computing systems to find the optimal solution for both individual survival and population reproduction.

Animals comprehensively calculate food pressure and war costs to select the ecological position of populations.

Humanity relentlessly pursues the maximum range of its weapons. In actual warfare, victory is achieved through optimal effective range. Human warfare is essentially a competition centered on economic power. Ultimately, the group that wins the economic competition wins the war.

The political and philosophical attributes of war

Philosophically speaking, humans are the only organisms in the Earth’s ecosystem that simultaneously possess both animal and plant attributes.

Humans have broken free from the reliance of other animals on war and plunder as the sole means of individual survival and group reproduction. Agricultural technology is the foundation upon which humanity has escaped war. From this point on, humanity can contemplate war, pursue war, and escape war.
War is also a factor in establishing patterns of human social structure, maintaining the drive for evolution, and preventing the degeneration of human competitive capabilities.


Crazy Ye’s Commentary on Taiwan

The significance of Taiwan to the East Asian Empire

China must understand Taiwan and Japan from this perspective. The Japanese should also closely follow this perspective to understand mainland China, Taiwan, and Japan itself. This is the best way for Japan to overcome its century-old problem.


Taiwan: The cornerstone of the Chinese Empire

Learn more

Taiwan: The Basis for Land Power to Suppress Maritime Power

Learn more

Taiwan: Turning on the Switch for East Asian Integration

Learn more

Taiwan: The Difficult Process of Governing People’s Hearts

Learn more

Mainland China: The Urgency of Accelerating the Return of Hearts and Minds

Learn more

Mainland China: The difficulty of quickly stabilizing Taiwan

Learn more

Mainland China: The Importance of Ensuring a “Clear History” in the Governance Process

Learn more

Mainland China: Four Walls to Ensure the “Historical Innocence” of the Governance Process

Learn more

Hot, Hot, Hot

Hot topics

Iran, Taiwan, Israel, Southeast Asia, Indian Ocean passage

Hot Topics

.

What kind of Iran solution should major powers choose?

The Israeli question in the Arab world

A “historical cleansing plan” for governing Taiwan

How can we accelerate the process of winning back the hearts and minds of Taiwanese people?

What kind of Taiwan solution can advance China’s imperial development process, rather than become a burden?

Does Europe face a Turkish dilemma?

How should Russia formulate its long-term plan for the South Caucasus?

How should China plan the foundation and advancement of its empire?

Will Japan side with China in the course of a war between the US and China?

How can Japan solve its century-old problem?

How can Russia increase its initiative in Sino-Russian relations?

Europe’s Painful Process and the Foundation for Resurgence

Russia’s next centenary goal

The Painful Process After the Collapse of the Russian Empire

Philosophy Community

The best way to understand military issues is through economic and political perspectives. The best way to gain a deeper understanding of political issues is through a philosophical perspective.

However, philosophy has entered a stage where it needs to be saved. The current state of philosophy is not only that it cannot save humanity, it cannot even save itself.

A very small number of great political figures have, in their spare time, dabbled in the field of philosophy, giving it a brief but brilliant brilliance. With the passing of these great political figures, philosophy has since faded into obscurity.

Before philosophy can achieve its great goal of saving humanity, it must first save itself.

Could Crazy Ye’s “philosophy of investigation and extension” be a prescription?

Does philosophy need a well-defined disciplinary structure? Or a disciplinary framework?

If you find Crazy Ye’s activities worth following, please subscribe to Newsletter for this website.

Track website activity

This is an online bookstore specializing in the works of Ye Qiquan. Ye Qiquan is known by his friends as “Crazy Ye.” He is famous for making outrageous political predictions. His major political predictions often contradict, or are even completely opposite to, those of professional politicians, political forecasting agencies, national intelligence agencies, news organizations, and well-known political commentators.
As early as 2003, he realized that Britain’s course of action in Hong Kong affairs “did not meet the strategic standards expected of an established empire.” This could lead to Britain losing its political presence and intelligence base in Hong Kong by 2047. No one wanted to hear it, and no one wanted to believe it. In this prediction, he effectively defeated the entire intelligence community, diplomatic missions, and government agencies of both the United States and the United Kingdom.
In predicting that Xi Jinping would be a hardline politician, he beat Western political forecasting agencies and professionals at least six years in advance. He issued a warning in March 2025 that Xi might face significant risks.
It made a clear judgment at least 10 years in advance regarding Hu Jintao’s complete failure. In a letter submitted to Chinese diplomats in September 2025, it even almost explicitly stated that “in complex situations, success cannot be achieved by relying on Hu Jintao.”
In September 2025, his assessment of the situation in China was that “all three parties face a complex environment.” “The party holding the power of tradition, the military, and other political forces with different backgrounds” all face serious difficulties. They all need to find “deep, comprehensive, and complex entry and exit points.” In January 2026, he reiterated that all three parties in China need to find complex, in-depth, and difficult-to-deconstruct cooperative solutions to save themselves. None of the three parties is completely dead, nor is any one definitively alive.
In fact, the Ukraine war reborn “Madman Yeltsin.” It was this war that convinced Yeltsin that his political talent far surpassed that of the world’s leading politicians and national leaders. Just two, three, and four months into the war, he made a series of political predictions. These significant predictions were gradually validated by the nearly four-year war. If the countries involved had accepted his predictions, at least hundreds of billions of dollars in ineffective spending could have been saved.
“Crazy Ye’s” flaws are obvious. He cannot react quickly to changing events because he lacks any internal sources of information. Some of his long-term predictions also conflict with the details of his reasoning. However, it is precisely his thinking method, which does not rely on internal sources of information, that is the foundation upon which he ultimately triumphs over numerous national government agencies, intelligence agencies, and large political think tanks in political and long-term predictions.
Students pursuing doctoral degrees in political science, philosophy, and military strategy, along with their advisors, are recommended to follow “Crazy Ye’s” website. Long-term political investors, government agencies, policy-making bodies, long-term investors, and even short-term venture capitalists are all welcome to purchase “Crazy Ye’s” products. “Custom-made products” are available.
pppnet.net is a blog website that runs in parallel with this site. It features blog posts by Ye Qiquan (Crazy Ye).