A24 – The Boundaries of the Application of the Theory of European Victory

The Boundaries of the Application of the Theory of European Victory

Ye Qiquan’s first appearance: June 16, 2025

Abstract: European politicians and public opinion generally support the war in Ukraine and are striving to prolong and intensify it. This fact is based on three main reasons: historical idealism rooted in widespread anti-Russian sentiment, realistic idealism fueled by persistent anti-Russian sentiment, and quantifiable political and economic advantages. The first two form the basis of public opinion under the guise of political correctness. The latter becomes a tool for politicians to pursue their political interests. However, the European victory theory has its limitations. Once these limitations are crossed, Europe’s quantifiable political and economic advantages cease to exist, thus triggering another war prediction: the European defeat theory. Both the European victory and European defeat theories have their fertile ground. Their suitable ground depends on the changing international situation and the shifting geopolitical forces.

Conclusion: The “European Victory Theory” is based on an analysis of the operational mechanisms of the Ukrainian war over the past three years. Although the war is not yet over, the outcome is largely predetermined. This was achieved by establishing a “Ukrainian defense line” and a “northern blockade line” to isolate Russia from the European development process. By prolonging the war, continuously depleting and compressing Russia, and awaiting further political changes, this approach is conducive to realizing European realism and historical ideals. Not only do numerous economic and social indicators support the “European Victory Theory,” but the course of the war and the actual front lines also validate the continued validity of this theory. This theory may provide legitimacy for the continuation of the Ukrainian war, making an end to the war and an effective ceasefire difficult. However, the “European Victory Theory” may have a boundary of applicability. This boundary may limit its application in eastern Ukraine and beyond, bounded by the L2 line.

Footnotes: 1. All calculation data are from the World Bank database and other widely recognized sources. Please refer to Appendix 2, Data and Materials, for details. All data used in the calculations were published before April 2022. Due to the sheer volume of work, annual data updates are not possible. Even if calculation data needs to be updated due to changes, the 2022 data will still be used to avoid disrupting the overall calculation system.

https://bookstore.pppnet.net/zh/downloads/condition-for-european-triumph-narrative/

欧洲胜利论的应用边界

Similar Posts

  • A4 – The Starting Point of the New Order in East Asia

    The new East Asian order is the key and symbol of the formal formation of the Chinese empire. Its cornerstone is the establishment of a strong military pillar in Taiwan by China. This pillar will become a “land bridge salient” or “sword of land power” eroding maritime power. This “land sword” not only compresses the naval power of the United States but also severely weakens the “naval characteristics” of Japan and South Korea. This lays the foundation for China to establish a “new East Asian order” led by China. Based on this cornerstone of Taiwan, there are at least three paths to establishing this “new East Asian order”: the bipartisan path, the tripartite path, and the quadripartite path.

  • A7 – The “New Order” from a Chinese Perspective

    Why does China employ a “destructive strategy” to gain (seize) economic benefits? Will this “destructive strategy” result in a win-win situation or a total loss? Understanding this issue from the perspective of imperial power and imperial order is a crucial approach. Imperial power and imperial order are closely intertwined not only with China’s current problems but also with universal global issues. China already possesses a complete imperial core. Now is the historical opportune moment to construct China’s outward imperial framework. The imperial core is the foundation for building the outward imperial framework, and the outward imperial framework is essential for maintaining the vitality of the imperial core. Currently, China is in a historical window of opportunity to build its outward imperial framework. Missing this window could plunge China into another 200-year period of economic colonization. For the United States, there are multiple options for rebuilding the imperial order. These include rebuilding the North American-European axis, establishing a new North American-European-Russian axis, jointly building a North American-China axis, or retreating to the Americas to exercise the functions of a land-based empire. The North American-China axis is not a priority for the United States. However, China’s priority is forcing the United States to choose this option. Moreover, this priority is substantially beneficial to the long-term interests of the United States, which is the underlying logic behind the United States’ ultimate choice of this option.

  • A21 – Concerns about China’s governance of Taiwan

    The diplomatic quagmire of post-Soviet Russia, the failures of the Soviet Union and the United States in governing Afghanistan, and Armenian pursuit of historical debts against Turkey are all key factors that have caused concern among China’s conservative faction regarding the governance of Taiwan. I would like to discuss my understanding of this issue from the perspectives of imperial power, peripheral tendencies, ethnic identity, and historical innocence.