This is a mass email sent on November 7, 2025. It was used to confirm the publication date of some research content and outline. In its content, the email predicted the risks facing Chinese military leaders. It also predicted that if China’s three main political blocs could not find a solution to deeply entangle and bind them together, all three would be at political risk.
https://bookstore.pppnet.net/zh/downloads/bulk-email-on-7nov2025/
Why does China employ a “destructive strategy” to gain (seize) economic benefits? Will this “destructive strategy” result in a win-win situation or a total loss? Understanding this issue from the perspective of imperial power and imperial order is a crucial approach. Imperial power and imperial order are closely intertwined not only with China’s current problems but also with universal global issues. China already possesses a complete imperial core. Now is the historical opportune moment to construct China’s outward imperial framework. The imperial core is the foundation for building the outward imperial framework, and the outward imperial framework is essential for maintaining the vitality of the imperial core. Currently, China is in a historical window of opportunity to build its outward imperial framework. Missing this window could plunge China into another 200-year period of economic colonization. For the United States, there are multiple options for rebuilding the imperial order. These include rebuilding the North American-European axis, establishing a new North American-European-Russian axis, jointly building a North American-China axis, or retreating to the Americas to exercise the functions of a land-based empire. The North American-China axis is not a priority for the United States. However, China’s priority is forcing the United States to choose this option. Moreover, this priority is substantially beneficial to the long-term interests of the United States, which is the underlying logic behind the United States’ ultimate choice of this option.
This is a mass email sent on September 15, 2025. It serves only as proof of the publication date to demonstrate the initial public release of a portion of the written content and research outline. https://bookstore.pppnet.net/zh/downloads/bulk-email-on-15sep2025/ 2025年9月15日的群发邮件
The Path and Variables to Establishing a New Order in East Asia (Research outline/political prediction/political speculation) Ye Qiquan, September 15, 2025 Abstract: From a historical perspective, a new order in East Asia is a reasonable expectation. This new order reflects a new historical trend: the rise of land-based politics and the decline of sea-based politics….
The diplomatic quagmire of post-Soviet Russia, the failures of the Soviet Union and the United States in governing Afghanistan, and Armenian pursuit of historical debts against Turkey are all key factors that have caused concern among China’s conservative faction regarding the governance of Taiwan. I would like to discuss my understanding of this issue from the perspectives of imperial power, peripheral tendencies, ethnic identity, and historical innocence.
European politicians and public opinion generally support the war in Ukraine and are striving to prolong and intensify it. This fact is based on three main reasons: historical idealism rooted in widespread anti-Russian sentiment, realistic idealism fueled by persistent anti-Russian sentiment, and quantifiable political and economic advantages. The first two form the basis of public opinion under the guise of political correctness. The latter becomes a tool for politicians to pursue their political interests. However, the European victory theory has its limitations. Once these limitations are crossed, Europe’s quantifiable political and economic advantages cease to exist, thus triggering another war prediction: the European defeat theory. Both the European victory and European defeat theories have their fertile ground. Their suitable ground depends on the changing international situation and the shifting geopolitical forces.
The new East Asian order is the key and symbol of the formal formation of the Chinese empire. Its cornerstone is the establishment of a strong military pillar in Taiwan by China. This pillar will become a “land bridge salient” or “sword of land power” eroding maritime power. This “land sword” not only compresses the naval power of the United States but also severely weakens the “naval characteristics” of Japan and South Korea. This lays the foundation for China to establish a “new East Asian order” led by China. Based on this cornerstone of Taiwan, there are at least three paths to establishing this “new East Asian order”: the bipartisan path, the tripartite path, and the quadripartite path.
